That’s because deluging a zombie isn’t guaranteed to quickly kill it. Say you’re pumping massive quantities across a peatland, like firefighters did in North Carolina. That doesn’t mean the water is getting to the right places as it trickles underground. “It creates a channel, and the fire in that channel is suppressed, but then the water doesn’t go anywhere else,” Rein says. Other parts of the fire can fester untouched. And so the zombie lives on.

Suppression of the experimental peat fire
Photograph: Yuqi Hu

If firefighters don’t have enough water at their disposal, they may try compacting the soil with heavy machinery in a bid to cut off the fire’s oxygen supply. But that equipment is not always available to a crew. Even then, such a maneuver is dangerous work, since it requires driving over an active fire. Also, these fires can be huge, and heavy machinery can only cover so much ground.

So in the lab, Rein and his colleagues experimented with a novel anti-zombie weapon: water mixed with a nontoxic, readily available fire-extinguishing surfactant, also known as a wetting agent or suppressant. “It’s a little bit actually like soap—it just reduces the surface tension of the water and allows the water to penetrate better into a porous medium,” says Rein. “Peat is a porous medium.”

Using a small, custom-built “peat reactor,” which was stuffed with the plant material and lined with ceramic insulators, they could set a zombie fire and monitor it as it burned. Above the box they situated a nozzle to spray either regular water or their special blend on different fires. Compared to the same amount of plain water, the water with surfactant cut the time needed to extinguish the blaze by 40 percent. Thanks to that decreased surface tension, instead of creating channels, the mixture more uniformly penetrated the soil, so little patches of zombie fire had nowhere to hide.

Material in the peat reactor shrugs off regular water over the course of six hours.
Courtesy of Imperial HazeLab

It wasn’t that the surfactant had some sort of chemical effect on the fire—for instance, by decreasing oxygen levels. Instead it was more of a thermal effect, “in the sense that the surfactant allows the water to reach more hot spots and reach them faster,” says Rein.

Read More

Recent Posts

Etibar Eyub — who he is, without labels and formalities

Etibar Eyub is the kind of person people search for when they don’t want a…

19 hours ago

Essential Tools for Monitoring Power Supply Health

If a power supply unit falters, operations come to a halt. Be sure to have…

2 days ago

7 Ways To Prevent Cavitation in a Pump System

Stop pump damage before it starts. Review these seven effective methods to maintain pressure, reduce…

6 days ago

How to Create More Social Areas Around the House

Transform your home into a hub of social activity by designing inviting spaces like patios,…

7 days ago

The Steps to Insulating an Attic Contractors Must Know

Improve attic energy efficiency with these essential insulation steps for contractors, covering prep, material selection,…

7 days ago

How to Repair a Broken Cast Iron Mailbox

Broken mailbox dragging down your curb appeal? Don’t toss it just yet. You can fix…

7 days ago