INTERESTING FACT
Imagine the world without cancer. It has been proven that cancer is a deficiency disease caused by the lack of Vitamin B17 (Laetrile). Today there are more people making money from cancer than dying from it. That is the one of the main reasons why Vitamin B17 is disapproved by FDA and cancer associations. You can do research and find that pharmaceuticals companies pushed FDA to disallow sales of raw apricot seeds in the United States. Raw apricot seeds are known to have abundance of B17 vitamin. There is lots of money to make from patented drugs and if we all start eating raw apricot seeds than there will be no profit. This information is not a new breaking research, but we are trying to spread the truth about Vitamin B17 through the Internet. This fact has been proven as FICTION. Please see the comments and draw conclusions on your own research.
Posted by: Vitamin B17 Facts
Rate:
(2.9) Science Facts Category | Review this Fact
Comment this fact. We value your opinion! Your e–mail address won’t be published. Comments will be deleted if they are offensive and make no sense. You can register your own profile avatar photo at Gravatar.com.
Newest first (older comments are on other other pages)!
Post your comment
Please wait...
Radiation and chemotherapy kill you. In cancer patients they put them through radiation, chemotherapy and give large amounts of toxins in the medicine so that it will kill you. They do that because, when you die, so do the cancer cells. Then they bring you back to life and put you into remition. You have to kill the cells before you can get better, and the only way to do that is to kill you. but medicine and technology has made it to where killing you and bringing back, is easy. Unless you are too sick, being brought back, thats what kills cancer patients. research a little more, you'll know im right in the end.
The audacity of people to actually think that something that is good for you is actually good for you!
Research: Dr. Max Gerson who discovered a cure for Cancer in the 1930's.
Research: Healing Cancer from the Inside Out. (Movie)
Research: Dr. T. Colin Campbell. Cancer research Dr. who has over 40 years in the cancer research industry. Proven that cancer can be turned "on" and "off" through the introduction of good and bad foods.
For a start the notion that the millions of healthcare professionals in the world (myself included in this group) are all denying a treatment which could apparently cure and prevent all cancers is offensive. Do you honestly believe that not a single person in the FDA, no doctors, pharmacists or any other healthcare professional would want to end cancer? Do you think that cancer does not affect these people and therefore they have no need for a cure either?
I am a pharmacist in the UK working for the NHS. This is a free public healthcare organistation that spends millions and millions of pounds every year on expensive cancer treatments. Does it seem likely that the NHS would contiune to waste so much money on these treatemtns if a cheap alternative which could cure cancer was available? The NHS makes no money and is funded solely from tax. One of the major aims for the NHS is to cut costs. If cancer could be cured with seeds the NHS would jump on the opportunity.
There have been no good clinical trails suggesting the benefits of B17. There is no evidence to suggest B17 is beneficial other than internet gospel spread by conspiracy theorists and herbalists backed up by no data.
If you can live with your conscience telling cancer sufferers to give up on their conventional treatments and take vitamin B17 instead then go ahead. However you are essentially telling them to stop a treatment with a known chance of success and replace it with a likely homeopathic dose of an unproven drug with a known risk of cyanide toxicity. In other words this B17 rumour could lead to cancer sufferers dying from their cancer more quickly and aggresively and also increasing the number of death from cyanide poisoning. Good luck clearing that one from your conscience!
You really need to take notice of Jessy's rather long but highly accurate post - yes there are people making profit out of this, but it's not huge. The profits from the main book in question that explains all of this is going to help people in Africa (if I remember right) & when the writer dies, the book belongs to the public. So not everyone is making profit out of the idea.
Most of the internet, if you search for B17 will tell you it cures Cancer. Only the official Cancer Foundation site will tell you it's fiction.
Many people are saying the Oasis hospital in California uses Laetrile as a treatment, but you won't find any mention of it on their internet site, even though it appears to be their main treatment. The Cancer Foundation would probably close them down if they told the public this, when their treatment cures twice as many people as conventional treatment.
OK, I don't want to make this too long, but I've spent many hours browsing the internet trying to find out if this is too good to be true or it is true. I even Googled "B17 doesn't cure Cancer" to try to be unbiased & it still came up with sites saying it does cure Cancer - try it yourself.
Sorry for the long winded explanation. My point was simply that even when Hunzas or Eskimos join our society, they remain cancer-free...until they adhere to Western diet. So in short, diet is everything. Before wheat, Millet was the grain staple in America. Rich in nitrolosides, it gave our bodies the B17 vitamin that watched over trophoblastic cells repairing beyond control...and regulated everything. I can go on and on, but the point is don't debate something you know little or nothing about - get educated my friends. It's all out there, in the tip of your fingers; you just have to...want to learn it.
As someone said in this forum, everyone's health is an individual responsibility but unless we work collectively to protect our food and water sources, we will all inevitably die well before our time. All to make some fat cats just a little richer, while dominating the world.
Ok, I'm off the box.
I won't use clinical studies or testimonials or anything of the sort to advocate or debunk B17 or Laetrile. I, by nature, am a skeptic, which means I don't believe anything until I've been able to study conclusive cold hard facts before I believe. However, I myself, was a skin cancer victim and patient in the US and UK for over 3yrs. Chemo and cancer drugs did absolutely nothing but prolong my process of awakening, but almost cost me my pancreas and liver. It wasn't until I had little left to turn to that I moved to Mexico for 9months..where I received IV and oral laetrile/amygdalin treatments along with raw fruit and vegetable diet, causing complete regression of any and all cancers. I've had numerous studies and tests done back in the West where no traces or indications of cancer exist, whatsoever.
So, does Laetrile or Vitamin B17 work against cancer? In the right hands of a knowledgable practitioner, and in concert with a healthy live-food diet, ABSOLUTELY.
On a broader note, for those of you that really believe the FDA and Pharma work with your best interests at heart. Please learn from our mistakes and actual data or proof of success. Even TV ads on Lapator or Klovix OPENLY STATE that one of the medications' side effects could be FATAL or DEATH. Do you really think they'd be trillionaires if they were out to cure or help people? If there's no money in it, they're not interested, period. You all need to wake up from that little dream we've been brainwashed with and take back our lands and agriculture. There isn't a single chemically engineered medication that can produce anything but more harm than good and while it only targets the SYMPTOM of an illness, it never actually cures or heals anything but rather breaks others that were trying to help you recover in the 1st place. Nothing replaces the real natural thing. Pharma cannot sell naturally available meds because they can't be patented. So while they started synthesizing them in the 60s, they saw more profit in making meds that would perpetuate the need for their existence. So, in essence, to agree with some of you, yes, they are in the population control business as well.
Just do your research people, stop believing everything you hear and read. Don't recite what you've been brainwashed and think for yourselves for once. Just don't go ranting about how ridiculous this and that w/out 1st doing your research. Ignorance is man's biggest flaw; don't perpetuate that with your empty claims and futile defenses just because you can't come to terms with the fact that you've lost control of your country and life and have been led like sheep to the slaughter.
Go out and take your lives back!
God bless us all.
-Seth
Can you provide any sources for this claim? Especially considering that there are lots of form of cancer made from different tissues with different properties and enzyme levels? I found some articles that claim from 2 times LOWER to 3 (not 3000) times higher activity of beta glucosidase in different types of cancer cells, compared to their precursors.
3 times higher is still not enough to achieve any therapeutical effect at safe doses.
The claim that amygdalin is safe for healthy tissue is false, it is main medium of toxicity of bitter almonds, and these are known to kill people.
Don't know about the rhodanese, but the claim that cancer cells "don't have it" is suspicious, too. Can you back it up?
All in all, this "innovative" and "natural" mechanism is called targeted chemotherapy. People don't "cover it up". They investigate it. Even other cyanide precursors are considered for it, but it is just not that simple.
and how come everywhere a topic on a related discussion is introduced there is always some suspicious post using 'LanGUAgE"
Good luck deciding everyone, I know that all the things that are high in B17 have never made me ill and the scientific logic for it as a treatment makes sense, yet the only thing the opposition can say is that it's poisonous (with no solid proof that I can find) plus the article says underneath
"This fact has been proven as FICTION. Please see the comments and draw conclusions on your own research"
I'm guessing that the site was forced to put this up since they chose to put the original article up. Yet they were not forced to put up WHY it's fiction. I think that's pretty interesting. Moderator please correct me if I'm wrong here and also post exacltly what evidence changed your mind?
it would be pretty sick though
Some things are gonna work and something aren't for certain peopole, I guess. Interesting topic though.
Possibilities:
1. B17 is really a cure for cancer
2. It is just a scam
3. FDA is corrupted enough to abolish a vitamin that can be a cure for cancer.
4. FDA did in fact know it's a good cancer treatment and abolished it.
5. Some people in here (from either part of the front) are just here to 'confuse' others.
Pros:
1. How come there is prove that is help cancer treatment and prevention in the past.
2. Civilizations cut out of the world with different diets are documented to have almost null cases of cancer documented over centuries meaning that their diets helped prevent this happening.
3. Thousands of people over hundreds of years have been studying and researching cancer for countless hours spending billions of dollars yet progress is almost null. How lame can this be................
4. Why would be people try to spread this over the INTERNET. How much profit will companies really make form selling almond seeds?!! (not much believe me depending on a number of factors)
5. Continuing with the one above....How come various videos on youtube...etc have been deleted, blogs closed,web sites closed or changed and how come everywhere a topic on a related discussion is introduced there is always some suspicious post using 'LanGUAgE"
Cons:
1. How come the rest of the world didn't say anything?
2. Can't there exist in the entire world someone who is kindhearted and who tried to inform other about it and prove it to others (are they all corrupted or 'under control')
YOU decide!!!!!!!!!!! :)