INTERESTING FACT
Darkness is nothing but a absence of light. You can measure intensity of the light to infinity but can you do the same for darkness? Cold is nothing but absence of heat. Heat can be measured to infinity but cold maintains a steady value at a certain degree. Absolute zero (-460 F) is the total absence of heat; and all matter becomes inert and incapable of reaction at that temperature. It was proclaimed that Albert Einstein said: "Evil does not exist, or at least it does not exist unto itself. Evil is simply the absence of God. It is just like darkness and cold, a word that man has created to describe the absence of God. God did not create evil. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God's love present in his heart. It's like the cold that comes when there is no heat, or the darkness that comes when there is no light." There is no proof that Einstein said this and there is no proof that he didn't. However, based on constructive thinking there is no reason to suppose that Einstein was part of this "fictive" story.
Rate:
(3.08) Science Facts Category | Comment this Fact
Posted by: powerofpeace
FACT COMMENTS
If you want to report the problem with the fact please comment bellow so we can come to a solution together. Your e–mail address won’t be published. Comments will be deleted if they are offensive and make no sense. You can register your own profile avatar photo at Gravatar.com.
Make A Comment
Please wait...
But as Einstein said: God did not create evil. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God's love present in his heart.
We created Evil, by doing a small negative deed every so often, we started to forgot God, as years pased on these deeds got bigger and bigger, until God forgot us.
We mean nothing to God, the more love we show and give the more we will receive in return.
The most beautiful gift you can receive from God, is knowledge (that He exist) and fear Him only.
i believe in god.
but there is no proof that he does actually exist.
no one will ever know until they die.
thats a true fact.
THAT is why Jews also go on the Sabbath. All of these texts came from the New Testimont, For some of you think that the old testiment is old and you should not listen to it. Well That is Not true. I Come from a Seventh Day Advenist Church Were we teach that the right day is Sabbath And we are getting ready for the second coming of jesus. Jews Believe that their is no second coming of jesus. Well Speccifucly in Daniel CHapter 4 said that their is a second coming of christ. If A Jew Would of read chapter 4 he would not be a jew anymore. Look, Another way to show the Sabbath is the 7th day of the week, Mathew Chapter 28:1 After The sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the Week, Mary Magdalee And other Mary went to look at the tomb. That tells you that the Sabbath is the 7th day.
Have More Questions? Or Comments?
Email me at famouselastword@aol.com
Einstein had on many occasions clearly stated that he does not believe the Christian god.
Here's a real quote for you, complete with citation:
The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this.
-- Albert Einstein, in a letter responding to philosopher Eric Gutkind, who had sent him a copy of his book Choose Life: The Biblical Call to Revolt; quoted from James Randerson, "Childish Superstition: Einstein's Letter Makes View of Religion Relatively Clear: Scientist's Reply to Sell for up to £8,000, and Stoke Debate over His Beliefs" The Guardian, (13 May 2008)
Einstein was an agnostic, but for a public face he--for practical reasons--wished to keep his lack of faith from the public. The press and the church wanted people to believe that he was a man of faith, and they succeeded.
One must distingush the public face from the private reality. His comments on god said in public are quite different from his personal writings. One such example:
"From the viewpoint of a Jesuit priest I am, of course, and have always been an atheist.... I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is a childlike one. You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of nature and of our being."
An act in arguing the proof one way or another on the existence of god is nearly an act on futility and is in and of its self merely speculation.
We cannot know something that is not present in the realm of sense. Metaphysical ideas like god or "H"is non existence is just a guess.
Any Evolutionist you try to point this out to uses the terms time and chance as justification for not being able to prove their theory. Time however wouldnt make life more probable but less probable. Natural Laws do not order and sort, they randomise and scatter. This is the Law of Entropy, the universe tends to disorder things. The more time the more disorder, not the other way around. The probability of the 100 or so amino acids that are required for the creation of a protein coming together in the right order by chance has been calculated to be equivalent to a blind man finding 3 marked peaces of sand in the Sahara Desert. Even as unlikely as this is, a protein isnt life. In order to have the most simple life you need 200 or so proteins. If the universe disorders things than how would it randomly order these molecules so precisely. DNA is a code made out of proteins which use the initials a,t,c, and g. The order of these letters is extremely important. Even sleight variations of a couple letters will cause problems. The simplest life consists of amazing specified complexity- equivalent to 1000 complete sets of the Encyclopedia Britannica. Imagine one typo out of 1000 sets of encyclopedias having an effect on the possibility of life. Thats only for the most simple life, humans have around 300,000 sets of encyclopedias worth of code.
Second, chance is not a cause. It is a word scientists use to cover up the fact that they are ignorant of a cause. If someone flips a coin you may say the "chance" it will land on heads is 50% but chance is not what caused the coin to flip. The primary cause was the person flipping the coin. There were also secondary causes such as the rate of rotation, gravity, wind, etc. If Darwinists dont know what caused evolution they should say so, they shouldnt be allowed to use chance as a worthy excuse.
Basically Darwinism is believed in by Faith. The less evidence you have for your belief the more faith you need to believe in it. Faith covers a gap in knowledge and it turns out Athiests have bigger gaps in knowledge because they have far less evidence for their beliefs than Christians have for theirs. Darwinism is a secular faith masquerading as science and unfortunately alot of people buy into what they hear because it fits with what they want to believe. The evidence is out there though for those who are willing to do a little research. Start with anything by Norman Geisler, he tackles alot of the tough questions. God Bless!
To Mary, you say that evil is the absence of good not necessarily the abscence of God. If you can tell a difference doesnt that mean there must be some sort of standard that is written on your heart of what is right and what is wrong. Where does that come from? What makes you cry when you see starving kids in Africa and laugh when you see an addorable baby do something cute? Afterall if theres no God then doesnt that mean that natural selection is true and starving children are just the weak ones that we need to be rid of. That was Hitlers justification for the Holocaust, to help out natural selection. Im not saying by denying theres a God you agree with starvation or murder, Im saying that because there is a God you know those things are wrong. When it comes down to it athiesm can not be consistent and say theres anything wrong with rape, murder, torturing babies, etc. because theres nothing that tells them those things are wrong other than how they feel. Feelings can not be explained by science.
To Tiffany, you claim that there is no truth, is that true? If its not than that means your lying when you say there is no truth. If thats a lie wouldnt that obviously mean there is truth. Postmodernist ideas are certainly popular in a politically correct society but they arnt at all realistic. Truth is discovered not invented. Truth is true for everyone everywhere and it cant be changed regardless of what people believe. We can believe everything is true (or nothing is true in your case) but that doesnt make it so. You cant be a sceptic of about everything because that means that you would have to doubt scepticism; but the more you doubt scepticism the more sure you become. Truth exists and the opposite of true is false. If athiesm is true christianity is false and vice versa. Someones got to be right.
That being said, there are 3 major types of world views that almost all religions fall into. These are Theistic, Pantheistic, and Atheistic views. Theists believe God created the universe, Pantheists believe God is the universe and everything in it, and Athiests believe the universe created itself. In order to prove Theism is the most probable, you would need to prove these other two world views false. Ill start with Pantheism.
Pantheistic religions are usually of the Eastern variety such as Hinduism and Buhdism and also alot of the New Age religions that are becoming more popular. Sense Pantheists believe that God is the universe, they believe that the universe is eternal. This has been scientifically proven false for a variety of reasons.
1) The Second Law of Thermo Dynamics states the universe is running out of energy. The first law states there is a set amount of energy in the universe. If the universe was infinite and always existed it would have run out of energy by now like a running car would run out of gas.
2) The universe is expanding and more importantly it is expanding from a single point, like a rock dropped into a lake has ripples that spread out from a single point.
3) Scientist have found radiation in the universe that is consistent with a massive explosion.
Ok, so Pantheistic relgions cant be true. The universe came into existence through the Big Bang, so what? Atheistic religions agree that the Big Bang happened, however the problem arises when they try to explain what CAUSED the Big Bang. Einsteins theory of relativity states that space, time, and matter are corelative, which means you cant have one without the other two and vice versa. If there was no space, time, and matter before the big bang, than something outside of space, time, and matter must have caused it. How do you get something out of nothing? "Everything that had a beginning had a cause" is the Law of Causality, which is THE fundamental principle of science. Without the Law of Causality, science is impossible. If you dont think that a supreme, infinite, intelligent being could create the universe and the amazing life that exists than why is it more likely for you that unintelligent, random, natural processes could cause it? God has left enough evidence in this world to convince anyone willing to believe, yet he has also left some ambiguity so as not to compel the unwilling. I could argue the existence of God for hours but ultimately anything I say will only reach your mind and your resistance towards God may not be entirely mental but emotional and volitional as well. I cant do anything about your heart, but Gods been looking forward to the opprotunity of helping you if you would lt him. Despite what people want to believe the truth is hes real and he loves you. Stop fighting it.
Seeing you talk about Atheistic beliefs tells me that you obviously have no idea what an Atheist is. Atheists do not necessarily share any common beliefs with any other Atheist at all, other than the fact neither of them have seen any reason to believe that any God or gods exist. That’s it. Two Atheists can think completely opposite of each other on every single other issue. Atheists do not have to think that evolution happens either. Granted, most of the do, but they don’t have to. It is completely up to them. There is no Atheist doctrine. They share absolutely nothing with other Atheists other than a lack of belief in a God or gods.
You talking about the beliefs of Atheists is like you talking about the beliefs of people who do not believe that all frogs on earth are controlled by Martian alligators; it’s just stupid. The fact that someone does not believe that frogs on earth are controlled by Martian alligators tells you absolutely nothing else about what they believe about anything.
Why do you try to disprove evolution? The topic is obviously something you know nothing about. It’s clear that you have gone to a creation website and quickly gathered some bogus arguments. The fact that you try to connect abiogenesis with evolution shows your ignorance. They have nothing to do with each other. Evolution makes ZERO attempts to explain the origin of life. It only attempts to explain how life diversified once it already existed. Scientists have no problem saying they do not know exactly how life started yet. At one time, we did not know why the seasons change, or why we get sick. Science is always expanding, gaining more knowledge. It is the opposite of religion. Religion stays rigid even in the face of overwhelming evidence (which is the reason you are on this board trying to disprove a theory that you clearly have no knowledge of).
And if you think you are an expert in the field and have a vast supply of un-tapped knowledge on the subject, surely you could easily get your studies published in scientific journals and win a Nobel Prize. Why don’t you do that?
AND EVEN IF YOU DID… it would have absolutely nothing to do with whether or not your god exists. If evolution does not happen the way we think it does, so what? You would not be hurting the feelings of any Atheists that I know. It’s not something that they cling to. They typically just accept that it happens because that is the current understanding of biology; the same reason most people accept contemporary scientific theories. The same way you accept them, unless they conflict with your bronze-age holy book of course. If somehow evolution would be proven wrong, who cares? We would be glad to find a better explanation.
Also, your earlier posts, where you were trying so desperately to somehow prove the existence of your god, did nothing to prove it at all. Even if your arguments would have been sound, all you would have done is laid out a case for a first cause. It would have said NOTHING about that first cause. It did not have to be a god. Even if it was a god, it did not have to be one that is willing or even able to interfere with our lives. Even if it were willing and able to do those things, it does not mean that it loves us or wants the best for us. Even if it was willing, able, and good intentioned, it may not be around anymore or could have lost interest and started a new universe. There are infinite possibilities. So, like I said, even if your arguments were good, it would not have gone iota toward proving that your god exists.
What is wrong with saying that we do not know yet? That is the Atheistic position. How you think you’re able to disprove a stance that says “I’m not sure how it happened yet” is beyond me. You are the one claiming certainty, not the Atheists. You are claiming not only that there was a creator, but that you know how it wants us to act, what it wants us to eat, and who it wants us to have sex with. There is no way you can know those things. You can claim to all you want, but you have no idea whether or not those things are true.
And how about your, “it’s dangerous to wait and see” argument? Are you kidding? If not, then do you take the same approach to every other possible god? What if god is a giant porcupine and the only way to get into heaven is to round up all the porcupines you can get and cuddle with them while you sleep? Are you going to start doing that now? Just in case? What if god is a palm tree and it requires you to wear palm fronds on your head every time you use the restroom? Are you prepared to start doing that? Just in case? Nevertheless, that argument is unbelievably stupid.
My view on Atheism is that Athiests' believe that God doesn't exist. I was only trying to point out that if God doesn't exist than everything came about through natural causes. Someone can decide not to believe in anything but we still exist, they've just decided not to think about how. I know alot more about evolution than you may think. Ive read several books including Richard Dawkins' "The Selfish Gene" and "The God Dillusion." Ive collected alot of facts. However, I have no knowledge of my own. I wouldnt be able to write a scientific paper and get it published because everything I know Ive learned from other (more intelligent) people. I was only trying to present the other side of the argument and inform people of some facts they may not have been aware of. There are hundreds of books full of information on the subject. I obviously cant post everything there is to know about the topic. That being said, Im not afraid of looking into science to find the truth. I just dont want the truth to be tainted by biased sceptics.
You claim that you would be open to finding a better explanation? Dont you mean that you would be open to finding a better explantion that doesnt require any accountability? I believe that God and his word are that better explanation, their just not an explantion your willing to accept. When you say we know nothing about the nature of God your forgetting that theres a whole book describing him in detail. There's tons of evidence from numerous scholars proving the historical validity of the Bible but Im not going to spend the time writing out what they've found because you can find the information on your own if your interested. Lee Stroble's "The Case for Christ" is a good start. You may have decided not to listen to what the Bible has to say but it does tell us how were supposed to act. You cant deny that through its words millions of lives have been transformed for the better, mine included.
In your post you made the comment, "What is wrong with saying that we do not know yet? That is the Atheistic position. How you think you’re able to disprove a stance that says “I’m not sure how it happened yet” is beyond me. You are the one claiming certainty, not the Atheists." Im afraid your mistaken here. Someone who doesnt know where we came from is called an Agnostic, that sounds like what you're refering to. An Athiest is certain there is no God, just like a good Christian should be certain there is one. The problem with being an Agnostic is that you're not on either side of the fence. You claim that you're nuetral but isnt the purpose of being open minded so that we can recognize the truth when we see it? Claiming there is no evidence and no truth is just denying the facts. Its deliberately choosing to be empty minded. An Agnostic is also certain of their belief, they're just certain that its impossible to know anything for certain (ironic isnt it haha). Your absolutely right, believing God is a palm tree and it requires you to wear palm fronds on your head every time you use the restroom would be unbelievably stupid haha. But I dont believe in that not only because theres absolutely no proof for that but it contradicts what the Bible teaches. If the Bible is true than anything contradicting the Bible is false. Ive decided where I stand on the issue.
I want everyone to experience the joy that a life in Christ brings and hope for your sake that Im wrong about the reality of hell but I believe youve already decided God doesnt exist and no amount of evidence will be sufficient for you. If you do want to open your mind to the possibility of Christianity being true I would start by reading the book of John. If nothing else you'll learn what Christians believe and have a better understanding of who we believe God is. I hope I dont come across as a jerk who is only trying to win an argument. Like I said I only have everyones best interest in mind. I wouldnt fight as hard if it weren't such an important issue. I wish you well Pete, take care.
Wow. Where should I start..?
Your estimation that I have not read the bible is incredibly far off. It is just about as misinformed as your views on evolution. Why would you assume that I had not read it? I have read the bible; many times. I have also studied both the New and Old Testaments as part of undergraduate coursework. They were separate courses. An entire course devoted specifically to the Old Testament, and an entire course devoted specifically for the New Testament. I have also read the Koran and the Hadith, along with multiple other religious texts. Have you?
I was also raised as a church-going, Protestant Christian. As a teenager, in the church, I was an acolyte and Sunday School teacher. I was in the voice choir and the bell choir. My parents were both on the Church Council- my mother was the President. My entire family was extremely involved in the church. We were at the head of every committee. We had control of literally everything in the church, from the budget, to the daily functions, to selecting a Pastor. It was all controlled by my family, and still is. My father even resigned from a managerial position at a printing plant to become the church custodian/maintenance man when we were unable to find a replacement for one that quit. Since the elementary school that the church ran did not close until 6 o’clock, every night, my Mother would take us kids down to help my Father clean the school. Being that I was in both choirs and an acolyte, I had to attend all 3 services every single Sunday. For about 10 years, I was at church every single day of the week except Saturday, and oftentimes, I ended up there Saturday somehow too.
You should get the point by now, that I have studied the Bible extensively. I suspect I’ve examined it with more veracity than you have. My knowledge of the Bible has been probed and scrutinized by a Ph.D. and has been found sufficient.
Do not assume that because someone that is an Atheist, they have not read the Bible. Your, “If you do want to open your mind to the possibility of Christianity being true I would start by reading the book of John. If nothing else you'll learn what Christians believe and have a better understanding of who we believe God is.” Sounds pretty stupid now, doesn’t it? You will find that most Atheists are far more familiar with the Bible, and especially with other religious books, than Christians are.
I have also read The Case for Christ. I actually have it on DVD. It is LAUGHABLE. Really, it is literally humorous.
Your “holy book”, the Bible, has been through way more edits than I’m sure you’re aware of. The democratic and political fashion in which it was constructed alone is enough to render that text a dead relic of the past, only as useful as any other historical fiction. That its claims are inconsistent, self-contradictory, logically impossible and historically and scientifically inaccurate end up being just little extra reasons to discredit it- that's how bad it is.
To use that mangled text in an attempt to describe a God is to make a mistake.
Also, this “historical validity” in the Bible that you speak of exists only in the imaginations of those who intend to peddle it. It does contain some real places and real dates, but a historically accurate text does not that make. Many works of fiction contain pieces of historically accurate information. King Kong mentions New York City, but that does not mean that a giant gorilla was actually there.
Whether or not the Bible has changed lives for the better has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not it’s true. Many books have changed peoples’ lives for the better, including books of totally different, conflicting, religions. And even if the Bible was the only book that had ever changed anyone’s life, it would still not mean that it’s true. It is easy to understand how something like that could improve someone’s life. The belief that all your troubles will eventually pass and you will spend eternity in bliss can be extremely therapeutic. That feat can be, and is, achieved by many books.
I don’t want accountability for what? I do have accountability, if my actions are too harmful to those around me, my life can be made to be bad; I could even lose it. I stand the risk of losing the only thing that I have; my life. Not only that, my legacy could ruin the lives of other people in this world, including my family. That is huge accountability. It is the Christian view that has no accountability. Under that belief system, you can be a nasty, horrible person your entire life and be rewarded with eternal happiness just for accepting a lord while on your deathbed, so long as you truly mean it. Yeah, that’s great accountability there...
As for your assertion that I am an agnostic: When I said “we don’t know yet”, I was not talking about the Christian god. I was talking about when or how the universe began. It’s true though, I don’t KNOW that the Christian god does not exist. Likewise, I do not KNOW that my parents are not reptiles from the 13th dimension that are here only to harvest all the grapes in the world and sell them to the inhabitants of the 26th dimension so that they can earn enough money to own all the monkeys on Pluto. I can not be CERTAIN about either of those things, but I am 99.9999999% sure that they are not the case, and that is enough for me. Could I be wrong? Sure. But I am not going to plan on it. I am going to live my life as if that story is not true. If you had really read The God Delusion you would know what I am talking about and you would have not said that. Richard Dawkins explains it very clearly on pages 50-51. Maybe you should actually read it, since you are already claiming you have.
Comparing god to your mother is highly inaccurate. A mother is tangible and you KNOW her for what she is. She is real, in your face, twist your life, fix your world, reliably there and able to be seen, smelled, tasted, and EXPERIENCED by millions of people all over the world and it is quite hard to debate if there really is a "MOM" out there. GOD on the other hand is claimed to be experienced by individuals with no REAL evidence to prove the experience or exsistence, however, this doesn't mean there is no GOD. But there are people in the world who have not been graced with an experience and choose to disbelieve or like myself, choose to wait and see what happens.
I whole heartedly agree with you about faith being all believers have. That is how GOD does exsists for the time being, on faith alone. Faith creates jihads and such, it is very powerful and enticing. The good thing about GOD is that it is positive for the most part and when faith is truly for the good of others it is a wonderful thing and does create the life that Jeff describes for himself. But for now, that's all that is fact about GOD: Faith. But even so, every thing has a hiccup.
I don't understand why and where this god business has to come in. Knowing other quotes from Einstein I highly doubt he put god into that equation.
Either way; it is far from being a fact. Makes me doubt other facts listed on this website.
"However, based on constructive thinking there is no reason to suppose that Einstein was part of this "fictive" story."
Please read everything first before making statements. We actually said that Einstein was never part of this "absence of God" theory.
I personally think that every person here that is trying defend a "higher being" then themselves that doesnt even exist is fighting is going to get NO WHERE! I mean for starters you are in the wrong part of this website i mean come on your in the sciece part of it. Infact i think someone should start a new thread stating all the ways that God or Allah(lol dont forget the muslims :P) exists.
Wake up to the society of today. Most people have moved on from religion and have started to accept the fact that God exists.
Nevertheless he left not Himself without witness, in that He did good...(Acts14:16,17)
Indeed, our God left not Himself without witness in the days following the Flood and the Babel fiasco, but He did good by implanting in hearts and minds of certain of Noah's children memories of the Creation, the Garden of Eden, the Temptation and Fall, the Flood, and God's plan for salvation.(extracted from The Incredible Chinese Script by S H Tow.)
He indeed not left Himself without witness for the Chinese nation by adding them the gift of the unique Chinese scriptures that carrying essential meaning and story for remembrance. Well, another fact is one in five of mankind is Chinese, with a population of 1.3 billion.( On behalf of all the Chinese, here I would like to thank God for the gift of the Chinese scriptures that we've learned)
Example of Chinese character that relates with the Creation of God is the Chinese word for 'create'
"And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness... And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul"(Gen 1:26; 2:7)The word 'create' in Chinese consists of some simple words or ideogram which is the word of 'dust + mouth + life' also = ' speak + move' that = create.
When God made Adam, He moulded him with the dust of the ground, breathe into his nostrils the breathe of life; and Adam became a living soul, a fully formed adult, able to talk and walk. This is the story of the word 'create'.
There is so many Chinese words that can relate to the story of 'early events' and the more significant ones would be the Chinese word for 'devil', 'tempter', 'desire/covet', 'naked' that tells the story of the Temptation and Fall of Adam and Eve.
Another interesting word that i want to share is the word for 'covet/desire'.
"And... the woman saw that tree was good for food, and... pleasant to the eyes, and... to be desired to make one wise..." (Gen 3:6)
Chinese made no mistake: it was the woman, not the man who lusted and desired the fruit. hence the word for"covet/desire" is made out of ' two trees + woman'.
coincidence? how about this? the word for 'naked' is made out of "body + fruit", is the 'fruit' which Adam and Eve ate that made their 'body' naked! There is no reason to believe that the story of the Creation and the Fall in the bible is not true based on the Chinese scriptures. ( I also couldn't find any reason how the Chinese could create the word for 'naked' with using the word 'fruit' if it isn't based on the story of the Bible.)
Coincidence again? (I don't think so because there are too many words that related to the Bible story.)
Want more? How bout the word of 'righteousness' that is made out of 'lamb' + 'me'. Amazing, how this gospel truth came to be written into the Chinese script over two thousands before the Lamb of God won for us our righteousness at Calvary.
Secondly, the message conveyed from Adam to Noah's Chinese children was well received: God's remedy for sin and prescription for righteousness was a Lamb,not any other animal. ( see Ex 12; Jn 1:29; Rev 5:12) Coincidence? Amazing isn't it? ( I really can't figure out why they use word 'lamb' for the word for 'righteous' as there are so many other animals to choose from but why use lamb if it isn't for the word of God?)
God has spoken: His revealed word is the Bible.
"All scripture is given by the inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness"( 2 Tim 3:16) And while heaven and earth shall pass away, "the word of the Lord endureth for ever"( 1 Peter 1:25)
For those who is unbelief, It's time to wake up, receive the truth that we are all sinner and the truth of the bible and accept Jesus as our personal savior. Global disaster is on the way. The hour is late.
"For ye a little while, and He that shall come will come, and will not tarry"(Heb 10:37)
"Behold, now is acceptable time; behold, now is the day of salvation" (2 Cor 6:2)
What is Jesus to you? Be not as a thief whose faithless railing earned him God's condemnation. But rather consider the other's response of faith. Turn like him to the Man on the Cross and hear Him say: " Today shalt thou be with me in paradise." Amen.
Those which is in Italian word are extracted from 'The Incredible Chinese Script' written by S H Tow.For those who interested to know more bout the words, you are most welcomed to read it.
(In case you are wondering, all the words are based on the ancient Chinese scriptures, not the modern ones!) Well, hope to see you in Heaven!
"And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die" (Gen 2:16,17)
the 2nd prohibition was imposed after the Fall and was directed against the second tree, the tree of life.
"And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken
So He drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life" (Gen 3:22-24)
Against the two trees the Lord pronounced a prohibition. So here comes the Chinese word "prohibition" consists of "two trees + God pronounced" = "prohibition"
(extracted from The incredible Chinese Script by S H Tow)
Coincident? Why believe in so many coincidences where you can just believe in one thing that everything is created by God?
Human, animals, water, everything on earth even the language that we r using is created by Him and gifted by Him?
I simply just don't believe we are existed by chance.
I hope some of you will find it interesting and believe what I've written here. Amen.